They may be unlikely human rights campaigners, but the owners of lap-dancing clubs have threatened to use the Human Rights Act, and if need be to go to the European court of human rights in Strasbourg, to protect their business.

Until now, the law has treated lap-dancing clubs like ordinary bars, subject to ordinary licensing law. But from this month, when the Policing and Crime Act 2009 amended local government legislation in England comes into force, councils can assume new regulatory powers over “sexual entertainment venues”, as the law now calls lap-dancing and pole-dancing clubs. Under the new rules, councils can force clubs to apply for a new sex establishment licence every year, just like a sex shop. The amended law will give councils more scope to consider residents’ objections to lap-dancing clubs and to refuse a licence if a club would be inappropriate in a locality. Crucially, it allows councils to set a limit on the number of sexual entertainment venues they want in their area. It’s these changes – changes that represent a victory for feminist campaigners at the Fawcett Society and Object – that have club owners worried.

It’s true that the ordinary licence clubs already have amounts to “possessions” protected by article 1 of protocol 1 to the European convention on human rights. But article 1 of protocol 1 permits the state to control the use of property, so long as the law strikes a fair balance between the rights of club owners on the one hand, and the public interest on the other. The new law plainly does strike a fair balance, and club owners have little real chance of resistance. If they try, they’ll find the Human Rights Act doesn’t protect property quite as strongly as they hope. My sympathy will, in any case, be with the councils they challenge. But as long as councils act reasonably my money, too, will be on them to see off human rights claims.

This issue illustrates, though, how human rights – and particularly article 1 of protocol 1 – are used by commercial interests to fight regulation they do not welcome. What’s so useful about them as a lobbying tool is that they combine a legal threat with a claim to moral high ground. Object is understandably concerned that lap-dancing clubs dare invoke rights: it seems wrong that they should provide a rhetorical shield for those whose success represents, in many eyes, movement away from humanity’s sunlit uplands. But our favoured causes have no exclusive title to the Human Rights Act. As Afua Hirsch has rightly written here, everyone has rights. And businesses certainly lay claim to them.

One of the important early cases under the Human Rights Act concerned the article 1 protocol 1 rights of a loan company. More recently, the court of appeal rejected an article 1 protocol 1 challenge by Northern Rock shareholders, including Jon Wood’s SRM Global Master Fund to the government’s compensation scheme. It’s difficult to argue that firms should never enjoy convention rights – if they didn’t, media organisations like the Guardian would be unable to enforce freedom of expression, in all our interests. And, to be fair, the Northern Rock appeal involved small shareholders as well as offshore financial institutions. But there is a real absurdity in the idea that a hedge fund based in the Cayman Islands can claim its human rights have been breached.

Those who defend the HRA in its current form have simply to accept it can be invoked, even if unsuccessfully, in ways they find unattractive, while all of us endure businesses’ often empty legal rhetoric. More importantly, those in power both locally and nationally must not buckle in the face of self-interested claims to rights. They must defeat them.

Three lapdancing club tycoons are planning a £100 million merger, perhaps showing the assets and stripping need not be bad news.
Stephen Less, founder of Secrets, which has six venues, Glenn Nicie, who runs For Your Eyes Only7, also with six clubs, and nightclub legend Peter Stringfellow, with two, are in talks to merge this year.

The deal would create one of Europe’s biggest lapdancing chains and the three aim to float the combined business on the stock market in 2012.

Less said “We are talking about creating a £100 million plus company to operate across Britain and become Europe’s largest chain.
“Once this has been completed we will be looking for a major investor to take the company global before listing on the stock market.”

Less, who is leading the planned merger, is looking to compete directly with Spearmint Rhino, the world’s Rhino, the world’s largest chain of lapdancing venues.
Meanwhile, lapdancing club owners are nervously awaiting the outcome of laws that came into operation in April.

Clubs are now classed as sex establishments and local residents may oppose venues for being “inappropriate”.

Supreme Angels is a London escort agency which has undergone a new look website update in recent months. Their aim is to provide high class escorts from around the world, who currently reside in Central London.

Due to increased traffic from clientele in the suburbs and M25 areas, they are inviting escorts to join their agency for a variety of social functions or as private companions.

Supreme Angels’ aim is to attract well educated ladies who are conversant in several languages. They also require them to have grace and finesse to enable them to blend in with any social event.

Their photographs and profiles are real. Pictures have been taken within the preceding 3-6 months. Each lady is interviewed personally by the agency owner therefore avoiding any duplicity. What you see is the genuine article.

Escorts are desired for many reasons and that is why Supreme Angels is unique. High class London escort agencies provide the best escorts so always ensure that you choose one of these agencies to avoid disappointment.

Many of the ladies available from high class agencies such as Supreme Angels London are actresses and models.

Finding a London escort agency is easier nowadays. That is because this type of service is readily available online. All you need to do is to browse the Internet, find an agency, create an account, and choose a gorgeous woman from the escort London service. Because escort services are easy to acquire today, many men are tempted to simply get the first escort that they can find. This is a huge mistake because you might not get the kind of service that you want. So it is advisable to proceed with caution when booking for an escort through online service. Here are the top tips that you can follow to ensure that your safety and privacy are always protected.

First of all, you have to consider the experience and years of service of the London escort agency. In this kind of business, experience is very crucial. The escort service should have several years of experience in the industry so that you can ensure that it knows the ins and outs of providing escorts. If you get an escort agency with solid track record of good service, then you will not encounter any service glitch or problem. Experienced escort London agencies also provide excellent trainings for their escorts. These escorts are experts in the art of satisfying men. They are also classy and adept in adjusting to all types of social functions. You can bring your escorts anywhere without worrying about possible problems that may happen.

The security of the online services of a London escort agency is also an important factor that you need to consider. Take note that most escort London services today are accepting online bookings and electronic payments. There are many advantages that you can enjoy if you can book and pay online. However, you need to ensure that the escort agency can offer secured booking forms and payment processors. Make sure that the web pages of the escort service for financial transactions have the latest security certificates. Look for security and safety certifications on the booking page. If you cannot find one, then you have to look for other escort agencies. Your personal information and banking info will be safe if the escort agency has secured websites.

Lastly, make sure that the London escort agency has superior privacy policy. An escort London service with below standard privacy policy should be avoided. Before you book for a service, you have to carefully read the privacy policies and terms of the agency. Look for unfavorable provisions that might compromise you. It is best if the agency has clear and no nonsense provisions for its privacy options. You should also look for reviews of the service and see if you can find unfavorable feedback from previous clients. Look for an agency with impeccable record in protecting the privacy of its customers. There are loads of benefits that you can enjoy from an escort agency in London. But you still have to do your research to ensure that you will get the best and highly trusted escort agency.

An internet address designed exclusively for pornographic websites was yesterday approved by watchdogs. Hundreds of thousands of explicit sites are expected to use the ‘.xxx’ address as an alternative to ‘.com’ or ‘.co.uk’ after its use was officially sanctioned.  Some 110,000 sites have already made reservations to use the suffix, known as a domain, when it is launched in 2011.

But critics said the address will create an ‘online red light district’. They also warned the change would make it easier for children to find indecent material. Vivienne Pattison, of the pressure group Mediawatch UK, said many porn sites simply ask users to click a button to ‘prove’ they are 18. She called for ‘ meaningful’ protections against child access.

The creation of the domain was approved by the internet watchdog Icann. ICM Registry, the company behind the .xxx domain, expects to make £20million from selling it to around 500,000 websites.

Founder Stuart Lawley claims to already have 110,000 reservations and could get .xxx up and running within six to nine months after it is approved. ‘I think we could do a million or more. There are several million adult TLDs already out there,’ he said. Lawley claims the name will make it easy for web-blocking software to filter out ‘.xxx’ sites by requiring them to carry a machine-readable metatag marking them clearly as pornography It will promote more labelled content,’ he said. ‘People who want to find it know where it is and people who don’t see it or want to keep it away from their kids can use mechanisms to do so.’